oldrags: Unknown title by Jan van Beers, 1881 Paris After 1879 Van Beers began to focus on genre scenes and modern life subjects painted in a highly-finished Naturalistic style. He painted very small pictures, delicately brushed, hyper-realistic in their details and extreme finish. Success was almost immediate. However at the Brussels Salon of 1881, Van Beers found himself amid a scandal that would upset the Belgian art world and, at the same time, give him instant recognition. He exhibited two paintings at the Brussels Salon of that year, both painted in his new, miniature-like and hyper-realistic style. One of the works, The yacht ‘Sirene,’ was to become the subject of the turmoil. He was accused to have pushed his realistic style beyond the boundaries of the possible. The Belgian critics Solvay and De Mons suspected him to have painted over a photograph, calling his work a photo-peinture. While the Review L’Art Moderne defended him by suggesting that those were merely echoing comments of some artists who were jealous of Van Beers’s commercial success, the scandal nonetheless raised considerable attention. Van Beers decided to react promptly. He offered to have both his paintings scraped off and checked by experts . If they could discover even the most remote trace of the use of photography, Van Beers would pay them 10 000 francs for Lily, his second exhibition piece, and 20 000 francs for La Sirene, the prices he was asking for them. On the other hand, if they couldn’t find anything, the critics were to pay this amount to the Caisse de recours (a pension fund) of the Brussels artists. The critics refused the challenge, arguing that Van Beers just had to recognize his mistake. Then, on September 3, 1881, during the short absence of the guards at the Salon, an unknown person vandalized the Sirene by scratching off the face of the young woman. Immediately the painting attracted even more attention and crowds of visitors, who wanted to check by themselves if any trace of photography was visible. Van Beers took this opportunity to name a commission to examine the painting. It included the president of the Cercle Artistique et Littéraire of Brussels, the artists Charles Verlat and J.F. Portaels, and two specialists in photography and chemistry. After a thorough examination the commission’s report cleared Van Beers of all charges and concluded that he was “an honest man.” - FADA

oldrags:

Unknown title by Jan van Beers, 1881 Paris

After 1879 Van Beers began to focus on genre scenes and modern life subjects painted in a highly-finished Naturalistic style. He painted very small pictures, delicately brushed, hyper-realistic in their details and extreme finish. Success was almost immediate.

However at the Brussels Salon of 1881, Van Beers found himself amid a scandal that would upset the Belgian art world and, at the same time, give him instant recognition. He exhibited two paintings at the Brussels Salon of that year, both painted in his new, miniature-like and hyper-realistic style. One of the works, The yacht ‘Sirene,’ was to become the subject of the turmoil. He was accused to have pushed his realistic style beyond the boundaries of the possible. The Belgian critics Solvay and De Mons suspected him to have painted over a photograph, calling his work a photo-peinture. While the Review L’Art Moderne defended him by suggesting that those were merely echoing comments of some artists who were jealous of Van Beers’s commercial success, the scandal nonetheless raised considerable attention.
Van Beers decided to react promptly. He offered to have both his paintings scraped off and checked by experts . If they could discover even the most remote trace of the use of photography, Van Beers would pay them 10 000 francs for Lily, his second exhibition piece, and 20 000 francs for La Sirene, the prices he was asking for them. On the other hand, if they couldn’t find anything, the critics were to pay this amount to the Caisse de recours (a pension fund) of the Brussels artists. The critics refused the challenge, arguing that Van Beers just had to recognize his mistake. Then, on September 3, 1881, during the short absence of the guards at the Salon, an unknown person vandalized the Sirene by scratching off the face of the young woman. Immediately the painting attracted even more attention and crowds of visitors, who wanted to check by themselves if any trace of photography was visible. Van Beers took this opportunity to name a commission to examine the painting. It included the president of the Cercle Artistique et Littéraire of Brussels, the artists Charles Verlat and J.F. Portaels, and two specialists in photography and chemistry. After a thorough examination the commission’s report cleared Van Beers of all charges and concluded that he was “an honest man.”

- FADA

(via fuckyeahvictorians)

Source: oldrags
  1. lyleas reblogged this from oldrags
  2. milkywaywoman reblogged this from in-the-middle-of-a-daydream
  3. dispatcheshome reblogged this from oldrags
  4. yukonsoda reblogged this from romantisme1812
  5. quaintastic reblogged this from oldrags
  6. mitunamakara reblogged this from jicheshire
  7. postmortems reblogged this from romantisme1812
  8. shpgr1977 reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  9. i-dont-wear-dresses reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  10. afairydream reblogged this from victorianfairytale
  11. thekatboy reblogged this from victorianfairytale
  12. victorianfairytale reblogged this from in-the-middle-of-a-daydream
  13. thecandle-or-themirror reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  14. littleworlds reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  15. somethingfinalwecalllife81 reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  16. subspace-sahara reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  17. soiretoile reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  18. amillionreveries reblogged this from the-vintage-dress
  19. the-vintage-dress reblogged this from in-the-middle-of-a-daydream
  20. in-the-middle-of-a-daydream reblogged this from oldrags and added:
    Unknown title by Jan van Beers, 1881 Paris
  21. thetoddster reblogged this from romantisme1812
  22. romantisme1812 reblogged this from oldrags and added:
    Jan van Beers, Female Portrait (1881).
  23. diannealmond reblogged this from oldrags
  24. aerynia reblogged this from fuckyeahvictorians